There are three mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive sets of girls the author knows / is acquainted with.
A. Girls who think they *like/liked* the author ( as un-probabilistic as it sounds , there are all kinds of people in the world apparently. The duration of liking, from the data the author has access to, varies from picoseconds(1) to months )
B. Girls who think the author *like/liked* them ( yikes.. well apparently being antisocial and a bit acerbic is not much help. . female vanity no bounds . It probably helps female psyche to feel appreciated and admired - the author concurs that this is a shallow chauvinistic remark )
C. Girls who don't give a damn about the author ( Of course this includes the vast majority who are oblivious about my existence amongst many others)
Assumption:
The author assumes the fact that he mostly *likes* people belonging to 3rd subset need not be considered an anomalous character trait.
Lemma: Please not the pairwise disjoint nature of the above sets. For example there have never been girls who liked the author and thought he liked them or girls who think the author likes them and whom the author like ( namely C). Proof is trivial.
Lemma: Also note that for all logical purposes ,
Cardinality of C >> Cardinality of B >> Cardinality of A
Proof is trivial.
Thesis: Subject is not a misogynist. Q.E.D
Proof: Due tothe lemmas , C forms a sizeable proportion of female author *likes* thus negating the claim that author is a misogynist.
The author concurs that one should do a more detailed sigma-algebra or topology based analysis(2). In the absence of a fallacious logic such study would be inexpedient.
---
1. On second thoughts picoseconds is stretching it a bit.. Depending on various neuronal proceses a better assumption would be milliseconds to seconds ( Arbib, M. A, Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, MIT Press, 2003, p47-67 )
2. Rudin, W. , Real and complex analysis, McGraw Hill, 1987, p8-20
Addendum
Top 5 crushes of all time ( in no particular order)
1. Dr. Harleen Quinzel
2. Amélie Poulain
3. Ms. Audrey Woods
4. Catherine Zeta Jones for doing Gwen Harrisson
5. Dancing girl ?
--
Author is currently pursuing some work on Parametrics and Constraints under Ballistic Research Laboratory-Computer Aided Design system under gsoc program
7 comments:
hmm, its odd that you had a crush on a woman who was twisted beyond repair by a sadistic megalomaniac :P Ofcourse, i am assuming that since you used her title before she became one psychotic, yet adorable, bitch, you liked the vulnerable and malleable psychiatrist...
baap re baap... get out of kgp... u surely deserve much better than the fate of writing all this up.... and who is this dancing girl?? one of the familiar names?? :D
"twisted by a sadistic megalomaniac" :O
1. ppl dont change
2. Joker is definitely not sadistic. His only dream in life is to bring a smile/laugh on everybody's face. Isn't tht the exact opposite of sadism.
3. Megalomaniacal : I don't think deluded sense of grandeur is one of Joker's shortcomings.
@guptius
getting out on 27th :p .. maybe a beach for a quarter year
god bless you.. you will do good..! :)
dawn...after reading this post it's not very difficult to fathom why most of the girls are in category 'c'
:)
@amj
that situation as well as lemma is unlikely to change even if i were Don Juan himself :P
Keep up the good work.
Post a Comment